Story by Vinny Chirayil. Copyright of all visuals belong to their
respective owners and have been sourced from the internet.
Date : Sept, 2014
Our sun is not a motionless star floating in space. NASA says the sun moves around our galaxy's center. Hypothetically speaking, if the planets of our solar system left a trail of smoke behind them, the pattern would be that of a squashed spring. You will NEVER see an elliptical or a circular smoke trail, in such a scenario. Earth does not return to the same point in space after 365 days. Just think and use your brain for once, instead of blindly surrendering it to the textbooks and popular thinking.
Why are the textbooks and internet silent on this aspect of planetary motion ? If it is wrong then they should clearly mention that at one point it was considered but discarded later, just like the theory of sun going around the earth. The world's silence on the correctness or incorrectness of this model looks very suspicious to me. Most content on solar system that I have come across in print and digital, fails to mention that the sun moves thru space. I have no clue why. Young kids are educated about galaxies and universe but strangely our sun's motion thru space seems to be a secret. Maybe the kids can understand all other more complicated stuff but might not understand that the solar system is in motion 😊
Did you ever question the elliptical/circular orbit of planets, in your life ? If you don't think the helical orbit is correct, then I would be very curious to hear your ideas on it. What evidence has convinced you that the former is the correct model ?
FRAME OF REFERENCE NONSENSE
If your argument is that it is just a frame of reference, then why not teach that everything revolves around earth ? That is a much stronger frame of reference ! Going by this bullshit, we should be teaching that Earth is flat, not a sphere ! In all these cases, science didn't just say its all frames of reference - they CLEARLY said our ancient ideas were WRONG ! I totally refuse to buy the ridiculous 'frame of reference' nonsense. Science was and is brainwashing you with the wrong elliptical two dimensional orbits. Fact is, planets move in three dimensional helical orbits. Flat elliptical orbits are not mere simplifications. They are just WRONG ! Wake up ! Even the moon creates spirals around a moving Earth.
Besides, when you say it is just a frame reference, you imply that you were already aware of the helical orbits of the planets and just chose to tell the story from a different perspective. LIAR ! Get out of here !
You have to be an absolute IDIOT to call a spring a circle ! You can foolishly argue that it is a circle. After all, it just depends on the angle of view or perspective or frame of reference ! By this stupid logic, why not teach that DNA is a circle too ? You can also then foolishly extend the same logic to a pyramid and say it is a triangle or a square, depending on how you look at it. Who gave you the license to ignore the 3rd dimension and talk & believe utter nonsense ? When are you going to wake up and start using your brain ? Childhood brainwashing has life long effects, unfortunately.
Try passing this simple exam, in any country, with your stupid frames of reference logic 😊
My comments on DJ Sadhu's page :
They are spiralling down. Not flying in a circular path. Get it ?
Close minded skepticism of 'unscientific' scientists at display here :
Announcement of Nobel prize in chemistry, 2014 - https://youtu.be/FbfwcroJqWM
An astrophysicist's (Rhys Taylor) interesting perspective on this : Must Read
This article is a must-read for many of those people who foolishly believed the critical & misleading headlines of Slate and Universe Today's science magazines. Those magazines too basically agreed on helical orbits but disagreed on minor issues. But their STUPID headlines easily misled many jokers 😎.
DJ Sadhu's interesting article on his Solar System model ver 2.0 which he made after incorporating corrections pointed out to him by experts in his earlier 2 videos.
EVOLUTION (minority) VS. GOD (majority)
Flourishing religious faith worldwide tells me that the majority of people on earth are not buying into Darwins explanation that all life forms just automatically 'evolved' from a common ancestor - one single cell.
BUT THEN I WONDER WHY THIS FAITH BASED MAJORITY (except some Christians) DOES NOT HAVE THE GUTS TO SAY DARWIN IS WRONG. AND WHY THE 'SCIENTIFIC' COMMUNITY DOES NOT HAVE THE GUTS TO SAY THAT RELIGION IS WRONG AND DISCOURAGE PEOPLE FROM FOLLOWING IT, LIKE THEY DO WITH SUPERSTITION ? Both cannot co-exist ! That is a complete sham !
They have all been taught evolution in school and college but many of them follow some religion. Faith in god is fine but I would expect them to, at least, have the courage to say Darwin and evolution are wrong. In particular, I am thinking of all the religious people in India, the land of gods. Evolution and religion have completely contradictory explanations for origin of life. The ultimate irony is that you will find plenty of people who believe and worship god yet defend evolution also ! I think they are totally confused !
Ancient Aliens series on History channel theorises that aliens were probably misinterpreted as gods. Many cultures depict gods as descending from heaven or sky, usually accompanied by great fire and sound. Could the ancient people be describing an alien spacecraft landing ?
I think if you keep going up thru the clouds, you will eventually reach space. Surely, nobody lives in the earth's upper atmosphere ! So, if god exists then god had to travel thru space and land on earth. If this is true, then god is a mortal being and not an omnipresent entity as religious people believe. Is it possible that god and alien are the same ? Water, by any name, is still water. Isn't it ?
I also wonder why the gods or aliens (if they exist) could not recreate earth's success on mars, a planet similar to ours. Maybe they are not gods, after all. If life is eventually discovered on Mars and if it is only some sort of micro organism, then it would support my view that primitive cellular life forms create more of their own kind and don't simply 'evolve' into bigger and far more complex life foms, even after millions of years, unless someone interfered with the natural process.
And I too would say - "Oh, where is the proof of evolution, that you so strongly believe in ? Show it to me." Evolution believers are big on talk and low on evidence.
Points 4 and 5 are the main focus this article.
This 'science' pimp foolishly believes Big Bang & Evolution are 'scientific facts' (LOL).
Evolution is basically relying on deductions and assumptions and trying to link up various bits of info into one big connected story. But there is no observation by humans of one animal changing into another. Ancient people who at least 'observed' the sun moving thru the sky still got their facts wrong. A deduction like evolution, with zero observation, is at best pseudo-science, if not a religion (requires faith, in the absence of proof) and is just an interesting read for me. It is definitely not science ! Unless, you are saying that the definition of science and scientific method is wrong. Are you saying that ?
Definition of science is given at the bottom of the page.
READ IT BEFORE you start defending evolution.
Instead of asking me to read some book or watch some video or spend decades in a university, just tell me the points which have made you a evolution believer. Clearly you have access to superior info. So for my sake, just summarise it for me why evolution of all life forms on earth from a single cell is true and how is it worthy of being called a science ?
I get more sadistic pleasure in bashing up the pseudo-science believers though 😎.
I have even been branded as a troll by idiots in many 'science' forums, on facebook.
They were full of labels for me but zero on their 'evidence' for their foolish beliefs.
By the way, all the evolution believers i have interacted with, when asked to draw the solar system on paper, drew the wrong traditional 2d elliptacal/circular model of the solar system. That clearly tells me that these people aren't using their brains or thinking independently. They are merely parroting what was peddled to them in their childhood and thereafter. If you don't understand the solar system properly (which is taught to kids in grade 1 of school), I think it is safe to say that evolution is a topic far too complex for your understanding. Don't pretend to be a science follower. Go and read the definition of science and scientific method first ! And then apply that to all the stuff that you think is 'science'.
If Pluto is no longer a planet just because the majority of scientists present at the time of voting felt so, then by the same process and logic, Evolution is bullshit as the majority of people on Earth believe in gods ! I am not religious and am open to all theories and explanations but increasingly tilting towards the idea that we humans are the modified and Earthified aliens on this planet. There might be many more human shaped intelligent lifeforms in the universe, wherever it is that we came from.
A FACEBOOK DISCUSSION SNAPSHOT.
I am a christian by birth, not by faith but that did not stop my friend from labelling me as one. :-)
Though my friend defended evolution vigorously
and tried to take a superior-than-thou stand,
it was all talk, PERSONAL INSULTS and no evidence :-)
See another example below :
To save your time, I agree that I am a moron, idiot, a*ole, other labels etc. Now, can I please have a look at the evidence that convinced you that evolution is a scientific fact ? I too wish to be as enlightened as you. The moment these evolution believers start abusing and name calling, you can be sure, no scientific evidence or logical explanation is going to come forth. I mean, if you are sitting on a pile of evidence and facts, why lose your temper ? Just educate the less privileged. No patience for it ? No problem, just share your links as comments below this story. I am definitely hungry for knowledge.
CHILDHOOD BRAINWASHING CAN HAVE LONG
LASTING EFFECTS, REGARDLESS OF THE SOURCE.
If done from a young age repeatedly, even after becoming an adult, most individuals won't question the info they were fed. Some of them will even defend it very aggressively. It is ok to be skeptical about ideas that are different from what the masses believe but be an open-minded skeptic. Re-evaluate.
Science encourages the questioning attitude. Why not question the very 'science' fed to you in your childhood ? Question everything and ask yourself if it still makes sense to you.
Did you ever, in your lifetime, question the correctness of evolution even once ? Why not ? Don't you have any doubts on it ? If it so crystal clear and obvious, then why does religion continue to flourish on earth, despite everyone being taught evolution ? Do you really think you are one of the smarter people on earth and the rest of the educated and highly qualified people, who worship gods, or are open-minded about life's origins, are idiots ? Then, I think you give your 'scientific' temperament far too much credit.
...that all lifeforms on such a huge planet called earth 'evolved' from ONE SINGLE CELL.
I am not religious, so please dont start attacking religion or me or what my alternate explantion / belief for life's origins is and instead stay focussed on scientific evidence. Religion does not need evidence, only faith.
But true science needs concrete VERIFIABLE PROOF and in my 40 yrs of life I am yet to see it, with regard to evolution. How can you verify evolution if you say it happened over millions of years ? Then, it is just a theory, like the existence of god or aliens. Even religious people show certain evidences, which I cannot completely dismiss.
Saying everything has DNA is not evidence but an observation of similiarity and making incorrect or unproven conclusions. Its like saying, you and me have blood, muscle, organs and a skeleton, so we have the same father or mother. Or that the sun and stars revolve around the earth bcos I can see it with my own eyes.
CORRECT OBSERVATIONS BUT INCORRECT CONCLUSIONS.
I don't deny DNA, chromosomes, fossils or carbon dating. In fact, I agree with all the observations made by evolution believers. I only disagree with the wild conclusions drawn from them and being passed around as science. it is not science but religion, since a big leap of faith is required to believe it.
THESE WONDERFUL CONCLUSIONS CANNOT BE PROVEN IN ANY LEGAL COURT BECAUSE THEY NEED CONCRETE EVIDENCE, NOT PASSIONATE EMOTIONS OR TONS OF FAITH TO BELIEVE THAT A SINGLE CELL OR CELLS EVOLVED TO PLANTS, DINOS AND HUMANS. THAT IS WAY TOO MUCH VARIETY FROM SINGULARITY.
I am sure you believe in Darwin's theory of the survival of the fittest. In a face to face meeting, it will take me only 5 min to prove to you that it is not true at all and you WILL agree with me, at the end of it. The evidence is undeniable. It is just that you have been conditioned to think only in a particular way and keep chanting it repeatedly, right from your childhood. Questioning 'survival of the fittest' - https://pixotale.com/story/66775315/
How do you test and verify something if it happened over a period of millions of years ? Then, it is merely a deduction, extrapolation, assumption or speculation. Without verification, how do you know if the theory is not completely wrong ? And even if it was wrong, do you think the evolutionists would admit it ? The definition of pseudo-science, described above, fits Evolution perfectly.
YOU CAN FOOL THE MASSES. IT IS VERY EASY FOR THE VESTED INTERESTS.
We are only humans and science can be biased or distorted too. Don't be so naive.
SOME EXAMPLES OF MASS DECEPTION :
1) India's no.1 pharma company Ranbaxy easily fooled a powerful giant like US FDA with false data and malpractices. They got caught only bcos of a whistleblower in the top management, that too living in USA, where he could not be silenced.
2) Ex-US prez Bush fooled most of the Americans with his propaganda, while the rest of the world knew it was a dirty trick to get to the oil.
3) While many countries of the world believed in global warming and took corrective measures, American govt. was in denial and probably still is. Watch the Oscar-winning documentary, An Inconvenient Truth, to know more.
In the first 2 cases, one party 'manufactured' enough proof to convince the target audience of its correctness and succeeded with its agenda, for a while, but were wrong regardless. In the 3rd case, one party chose to rubbish and brush aside genuine convincing proof. So, proof can sometimes be created or rubbished to suit one's convenience.
THE ULTIMATE SCIENTIFIC DECEPTION !
All i am suggesting is that fake science CAN BE peddled to you as real science and it will 'look' very convincing indeed. The onus of proof is on 'scientific' people and not on unscientific people. The latter have the freedom and liberty to believe whatever they wish to, without any proof or justification. Thats why it is called faith.
AND IN THE EVENT OF BEING PROVEN WRONG, religious people may not lose much credibility bcos they never claimed their version to be science. But evolutionists will lose ALL credibility bcos they claim their version to be science and that everything is a proven 'fact'. Hence, IF the evolutionists got it wrong, they are more likely to behave like the American govt rubbishing and denying global warming or justifying iraq invasion, even after being proven wrong.
While evaluating any evidence, just check if it holds up to the definition of science and the scientific method and whether it makes sense to you or not.
Multiple explanations. Which one do you believe ?
Are you proof oriented or faith oriented ?
What convinced you ? Were you a kid or an adult when you got convinced ?
Did this happen in school, college or later ?
You might also like or hate my other stories :
Why 'millions of years' for evolution ? - https://pixotale.com/story/11826076/
Questioning 'survival of the fittest' - https://pixotale.com/story/66775315/
My blog : http://photo--paint.blogspot.in